@shaun is it bad to send tier 1 + all tier 2 links to an indexer? i've some resources left.. so as an extra.. next to the 3 tier building. I asume the GSA SER indexer will work, at least for 5%.
Guys, just for info. Have been running a test RankerX campaign and found some very high DA Web 2.0 profiles that give a DF (manual check) link. So could be good use on T1 with some T2/T3 links.
My project was:
T1 (all premium/manual selection)
- Web 2.0
- Web 2.0 profiles
- Social bookmarks
- PDF article
Then for T2 sent Premium Web 2.0/Profiles to T1 Web 2.0s. All links sent to indexer.
So far, 68 out of 812 links indexed. Links were created about 6 days ago.
I've been using RankerX for a while now although cannot actually say its improving rankings massively, just still working on my process.
For this last project I used "Site Selections" and manually selected premium platforms with DA >70-ish, then let it use ALL the Web 2.0/profiles premium accounts for the T2 to the Web 2.0 T1. This is quite easy(ish) to set-up using the Wizard.
I'll wait for more URLs to get index then start hitting them with a mix of Ranker/GSA T2 (GSA T3).
12348766754 I have some tests online right now with T1, 2 and 3 as contextual and all tiers are going to an indexer.
Been checking my old projects analytics today and the traffic has been dropping on almost all of them since Penguin 4 it seems . The rankings are holding but I think long tails are dropping off maybe, tbh I have no idea going to have to look into it.
Ah I totally missed the post where he broke his link countdown, perhaps it is the link count that is causing you problems, 812 links is not very many.
The site I mentioned earlier with T1, 2 and 3 all being sent to an indexing service currently has 147,513 tier three links built to if from Ranker X and I plan to increase this further.
@shaun 147513 unique domains as well...? Or Just blast it over a few sites. Last thing is what.i probably will do (have around 19k targets, working on more).
To confirm, @12348766754 had it right in terms of the T1/T2 breakdown. Only thing to add is that the T2's only go to the T1 Web 2.0s. So I have a current T1:T2 ratio of 1:13....need to build this out a bit
Forgot to add in a previous post, the high DA, DF profile links contain a decent block (I think the full article) of text.
@shaun "The site I mentioned earlier with T1, 2 and 3 all being sent to an indexing service currently has 147,513 tier three links built to if from Ranker X and I plan to increase this further"
@Shaun is there a possibility we could talk about my page once (just 1 webpage to save your time)? I'd rather send you the link in private though, since it's a real money site, nothing like a test site.
Quick question (as this thread has got me thinking): If I'm using Rx T1, Rx+GSA T2 and all links are sent to an indeing service....do I still need an "indexing" (i.e. blog/image/guestbook) GSA T2 layer??
12348766754There are many engines within social networks though :P I plan to show my methodology with platform selection soon its just all about time mate.
Yea inbox me your link.
echanneyI use SER for PBN management, works like a charm.
GreenJohn In my opinion you don’t, they may offer some help with powering them up by the main thing I used them for was indexing.
redrays Ah right I get you. My old method was 100% SER and the new sites that used that method but were created after October 17 just arnt climbing at all. I have checked the ranks for my old sites using this method and some are dropping but most are holding steady.
I have variations too where T1 and T2 is SER but some use a T3 where others use indexing services. All are currently acting the exact same.
My PBN site is holding steady and my T1 RX, T2 RX/SER, T3 SER is gaining, my T1, 3 and 3 with just RX is gaining. I have been doing nothing but typing stuff up the past few days in my free time so I havent been doing much testing as I plan to use it all as public case studies for the future now.
Edit - no idea why that crap gets put in when I type an answer up in an app rather than the website itself.
@Shaun thank you for your reply, this is the first time you post crap; but that's due the app I supose :-P (just joking about the "p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; -webkit-text-stroke: #1" part).
@shaun - gotcha. I'm doing a couple test projects using 3 tiers of SER (two contextual tiers and a junk t3) on some domains with decent rankings that stalled out. I'll post here if I see any movement. Gonna try to get up and running with RankerX next week.
@anth20 the tag went wrong somewhere. Normally when i click on IT, IT opens the account. By your tag it doesnt work.
@angrykor are you talking about 'reviewing' my onpage factors? -> @shaun has new footprints, and advises Footprint Factory for IT. I only have the extra custom engines of @1linklist
@angrykor yea, I used to use the free version but a few people have said it has been limited even more so you can do less with it now to try get people to buy the real one.
12348766754 I would try to double the content length on that page for that keyword, they keyword difficulty shouldn't be a problem.
The keyword density is crazy though no matter what calculation you use, out of the three calculations im getting 4.77%, 2.38% and 2.44% with it having 13 uses. This could work I guess but personally I would try bring that down to around 5 uses maximum.
It will be hard to workout if changes are coming from updating your KWD or from back links now but I still think it would be worth it.
I am going to do a test soon on the three main KWD calculations what one is most efficient.
@Shaun Regarding the keyword density, is it to high for on- or off-page? if off-page; in the past I had someone building links for me, I already saw that one was kinda high. Will add some profile backlinks to this page as well, with totally different but related keywords.
-> I'll double the amount of content right now, that's not so hard. edit; the content is almost double (slightly more). Better? :-) I could add more if needed, then i'll just add a part of "frequently asked questions regarding this product".
I do not mind if GSA SER posts all tier 2 URLS on the same domain for Tier 3(in same project). How can I put this in the settings? I am using guestbooks, blog comments, articles and trackbacks as for now.
Comments
i've some resources left.. so as an extra.. next to the 3 tier building.
I asume the GSA SER indexer will work, at least for 5%.
I'll check into your tactic tomorrow. Do you mind if I ask you a few questions in the future?
Been checking my old projects analytics today and the traffic has been dropping on almost all of them since Penguin 4 it seems
@greenjohnAre those 812 your tier one?
The total of 812 links of @greenjohn are T1 and T2 combined, i think.
Tier 1;
Article Directory 1 Link Set 2
PDF 1 Link Set 5
Social Bookmarking 1 Link Set 94
Social Network 1 Link Set 47
Web 2.0 Profile 1 Link Set 52
Tier 2;
Web 2.0 Profile 2 Link Set 457 (T2)
Social Network 2 Link Set 155 (T2)
The site I mentioned earlier with T1, 2 and 3 all being sent to an indexing service currently has 147,513 tier three links built to if from Ranker X and I plan to increase this further.
I'd rather send you the link in private though, since it's a real money site, nothing like a test site.
So I am sure I covered up the right things.
If you use indexer you do not have to use a tier 3.
Though, im doing both now... let's see what happens next :-P
12348766754 There are many engines within social networks though :P I plan to show my methodology with platform selection soon its just all about time mate.
Yea inbox me your link.
echanney I use SER for PBN management, works like a charm.
GreenJohn In my opinion you don’t, they may offer some help with powering them up by the main thing I used them for was indexing.
redrays Ah right I get you. My old method was 100% SER and the new sites that used that method but were created after October 17 just arnt climbing at all. I have checked the ranks for my old sites using this method and some are dropping but most are holding steady.
I have variations too where T1 and T2 is SER but some use a T3 where others use indexing services. All are currently acting the exact same.
My PBN site is holding steady and my T1 RX, T2 RX/SER, T3 SER is gaining, my T1, 3 and 3 with just RX is gaining. I have been doing nothing but typing stuff up the past few days in my free time so I havent been doing much testing as I plan to use it all as public case studies for the future now.
Edit - no idea why that crap gets put in when I type an answer up in an app rather than the website itself.
@Shaun thank you for your reply, this is the first time you post crap; but that's due the app I supose :-P (just joking about the "p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; -webkit-text-stroke: #1" part).
I'll send you the page right now.
@angrykor are you talking about 'reviewing' my onpage factors? -> @shaun has new footprints, and advises Footprint Factory for IT. I only have the extra custom engines of @1linklist
@anth20 cheers mate.
@angrykor yea, I used to use the free version but a few people have said it has been limited even more so you can do less with it now to try get people to buy the real one.
12348766754 I would try to double the content length on that page for that keyword, they keyword difficulty shouldn't be a problem.
The keyword density is crazy though no matter what calculation you use, out of the three calculations im getting 4.77%, 2.38% and 2.44% with it having 13 uses. This could work I guess but personally I would try bring that down to around 5 uses maximum.
It will be hard to workout if changes are coming from updating your KWD or from back links now but I still think it would be worth it.
I am going to do a test soon on the three main KWD calculations what one is most efficient.
if off-page; in the past I had someone building links for me, I already saw that one was kinda high.
Will add some profile backlinks to this page as well, with totally different but related keywords.
-> I'll double the amount of content right now, that's not so hard.
edit; the content is almost double (slightly more). Better? :-)
I could add more if needed, then i'll just add a part of "frequently asked questions regarding this product".
I do not mind if GSA SER posts all tier 2 URLS on the same domain for Tier 3(in same project).
How can I put this in the settings? I am using guestbooks, blog comments, articles and trackbacks as for now.