BigGulpsHuhWelp : So, It's amazing. I can't believe my eyes when my website ranked #14. I'm afraid that Google's algorithm. I will stop building backlinks and come back in a few weeks. If My website still rank #14, I will buy RankerX lifetime. Because It's really good for me.
shaun : The average number of searches monthly 33100. I got a report from Google Adwords that keyword is medimum.I was also very surprised by the high searches but my website ranked #14 in 12 day since I used RankerX
So, It's amazing. I can't believe my eyes when my website ranked #14. I'm afraid that Google's algorithm. I will stop building backlinks and come back in a few weeks. If My website still rank #14, I will buy RankerX lifetime. Because It's really good for me.
I would suggest that if you stop building backlinks your site is unlikely to be ranking anywhere in a few weeks. Keep building backlinks and if it is still ranking in 2 weeks you will have a better idea of Rankerx's value.
@jonesphilip49 Google Adwords competition has nothing to do with actual SEO competition, because that's competition of how many bidders are bidding for that keyword. Did you used only SER and RankerX or you used PBNs as well? Also how many Web 2.0 you created.
@jonesphilip49 as stated that has nothing to do with SEO its the advertiser competition, I am pretty impressed you got it to that high in so little time with the competition it has.
Not sure if it is the churn and burn effect though and will burn soon. Fingers crossed it holds for you though.
Send for me a pm. I will show you my keyword and website ranking page2. I'm NOT sell RankerX, I'm A Huge Fan of GSA.
Maybe, you have never used this software. I have heard good things about it especially considering that there are a lot of platforms compared to FCS and Turbo Web 2.0. So, I used RankerX since 2 month ago. RankerX is good, But It can't replace GSA for lower Tiers.
Can rankerx be opened by 2 pc 2 different locations at the same time? Thinking about purchaseing it. Or should i consider fcs / magic submitter before ranker x ? This rankerx is $50 monthly right?
I had FCS but as i understood it was sold and the new owner doesn't take as good care as it was before. I'm also thinking of getting RankerX. Do you guys recommend it for web2.0, or is there anything better?
Good software for this prices $17 Lifetime http://high-pr-blog-submitter.com/ I have this software, registration and posting success 30-35 top web 2.0 blogs
The high pr blog submitter.com is updated 2 times in the last 8 months. I doubt their template still work on certain sites. Dont thinkt it will output 35 live links.
Just buy hight pr blog submitter and guy respond directly on skype. Already see for new update with spin folder delete for article. You can post add account, continue to fulfill existing blog ...
Magic submitter - $67 per month ($5 first month) Ranker X - $49 per month FCS Network - $200 per year ($16-17 per month)
Not that viable, what else should we consider ? high-pr-blog-submitter.com - $17 lifetime seems too good of a deal but i dont know if he will support the tool long term also how successfull it is (30 web 2.0 seems great) I guess ser engines is bad now. What else do we have?
Hey Guys, I was getting a tonne of hate mail about it. People telling me to take it down and stuff because they didn't want other people to know about rankerx. I am going to make a better one today and reupload!
If you are talking about RankerX you most likely have to whitelist RankerX.exe in Windows firewall first. Then you can access it through [VPS IP]:[Port]. The port is 8080.
Ordered Pro plan for http://high-pr-blog-submitter.com/ and it's working very well, getting quality web 2 for first tire. Best part is this soft is very cheap and have best support, overall my rating for this soft is 4.9 from 5.
Serious? if i write in forum about tool I've purchased is spamming??? Already ordered, found this thread and left info for you and people like you who didn't know about this tool. it's not spam, it's advice
Personal, I think that It's combined between FCS Networkers and SEnuke. I see this video on BHW forum.http://recordit.co/NLc9EeBREc . I tried to use the new version from RankerX but I can't run Facebook sites while the recordit is SUCCESS.
Do you know facebook seo tools? I want to use a SEO tool which I can manage 100 Facebook accounts. Because It's seem I can't post article on Facebook pages.
basically rankerx guys didn't listen to us. When i say "us", i mean people who know SEO, people who know how to rank sites.
They just decide to go for noobs who thinks number of platforms and links are everything.
They even keep sites for posting that are banned from google.
As i said in provious threads we don't need lots of platforms or sites. We need handful of high quality web2.0 sites that are already ranking in google.
If you only worked with Premium Do Follow sites or posted to existing aged accounts do you find the posting functions are adequate or do you suggest something else?
Really interested to see others opinions as I am too bouncing between Rankerx, FCS and RankWyz.
I am more interested in the posting functions as I have a bank of aged Web 2.0's. Prefer to build these manually (VA build manually to be more exact) and just use this as Tier 2 posts to an IFTTT Network at Tier 1. So massive volume not my goal just a reliable, automated Web 2.0 poster.
Any other systems worth using to achieve this that anyone can suggest?
@mitch in my oppinion they have a majority of no follow links now. I am unaware of a way to select specific platforms with them so when I select the premium platforms I have to waste cash on no follow captchas.
They had so much promise at the start and then it's just as if the Dev gave up. I suggested a fair few pretty solid suggestions for the tool, I even took the time to explain how they help their users but they weren't implemented. This is the main problem with the coders who ain't link builders, they can make the tools but don't know what to put in them.
The Dev even offered me a partnership to JV with him on a competitor for SER but I rather do my own stuff.
It does seem a pity that the devs keep missing the mark.
FCS for me was always so good because you could get hold of Dan and he would listen. New guy says he has great plans so going back to the devil I know and giving them another chance. But don't feel good about it.
I am a coder/dev too so if you need any help to do your own thing I'd be interested in exploring possibilities. If you want something done properly do it yourself!
Hey @shaun, There is a way to select specific platforms but it isn't as straightforward as it should be and it reduces the software spamming abilities. What you need to do is creating accounts ONLY on your desired platforms first. If you import these accounts into a posting project Rx will ONLY post to these accounts. I've found the posts stick quite well but it's mainly up to the content I guess.
To be honest, the tool is pretty good. I don't select Web 2.0 Profiles because two third of them are no follow. I only use Social Network sites, only about 10 out of 50 are no follow. I don't know if there is any software out there has more Social Network sites than RankerX so I still stick with it. It has Site Selection section where you select the sites that are dofollow and use them in your projects.
@shaun You should take a look at Site Selection. You can choose them once and reuse them in the wizards. It would definitely help if you create wizards in bulk.
For lower tiers, GSA SER is the best choice so I don't use any of platform sites in RankerX.
One down side I found is it doesn't not automatically scrape for images so I have to scrape them myself and insert them into my articles.
Comments
Thank you for sharing your great experience
Send for me a pm. I will show you my keyword and website ranking page2. I'm NOT sell RankerX, I'm A Huge Fan of GSA.
Maybe, you have never used this software. I have heard good things about it especially considering that there are a lot of platforms compared to FCS and Turbo Web 2.0. So, I used RankerX since 2 month ago. RankerX is good, But It can't replace GSA for lower Tiers.
I checked it by https://serps.com/tools/rank_checker and check manually in my IE browser. I only use IE browser to check keyword
Thinking about purchaseing it. Or should i consider fcs / magic submitter before ranker x ?
This rankerx is $50 monthly right?
I have this software, registration and posting success 30-35 top web 2.0 blogs
Ranker X - $49 per month
FCS Network - $200 per year ($16-17 per month)
Not that viable, what else should we consider ?
high-pr-blog-submitter.com - $17 lifetime seems too good of a deal
I guess ser engines is bad now. What else do we have?
Iam the creator of the tool : http://high-pr-blog-submitter.com
The last update was done on 5th March 2016, I didnt update the Log.
Presently the tool supports 40 blog sites and will be add more on coming days.
Any questions or suggestions,please ping me on Skype : sunny94951
Check Out my Other Tools
http://www.apple-developers-inc.com/edu-backlink-software/
http://high-pr-social-bookmarking-software.com
If you are talking about RankerX you most likely have to whitelist RankerX.exe in Windows firewall first. Then you can access it through [VPS IP]:[Port]. The port is 8080.
Serious? if i write in forum about tool I've purchased is spamming???
Already ordered, found this thread and left info for you and people like you who didn't know about this tool. it's not spam, it's advice
Personal, I think that It's combined between FCS Networkers and SEnuke. I see this video on BHW forum. http://recordit.co/NLc9EeBREc . I tried to use the new version from RankerX but I can't run Facebook sites while the recordit is SUCCESS.
Would you mind sharing what you are currently using that actually does work?
Thanks!
Could you elaborate on that please?
They just decide to go for noobs who thinks number of platforms and links are everything.
They even keep sites for posting that are banned from google.
As i said in provious threads we don't need lots of platforms or sites. We need handful of high quality web2.0 sites that are already ranking in google.
Simple as that
I am currently using it on a project purely because there is nothing else in my oppinion that can do it on the scale I need.
I am hoping for good things from SEREngines V2 but if it sucks too I am considering making my own product.
If you only worked with Premium Do Follow sites or posted to existing aged accounts do you find the posting functions are adequate or do you suggest something else?
They had so much promise at the start and then it's just as if the Dev gave up. I suggested a fair few pretty solid suggestions for the tool, I even took the time to explain how they help their users but they weren't implemented. This is the main problem with the coders who ain't link builders, they can make the tools but don't know what to put in them.
The Dev even offered me a partnership to JV with him on a competitor for SER but I rather do my own stuff.
There is a way to select specific platforms but it isn't as straightforward as it should be and it reduces the software spamming abilities.
What you need to do is creating accounts ONLY on your desired platforms first. If you import these accounts into a posting project Rx will ONLY post to these accounts.
I've found the posts stick quite well but it's mainly up to the content I guess.