Skip to content

Web 2.0s - What Do You Use To Create Them?

ptr22ptr22
in GSA Search Engine Ranker
What's the best way to create Web 2.0 properties?
  • SEREngines?
  • FCS Networker?
  • SyndWire?
  • Manually (by an outsourced contractor)?
  • Something else?

Comments

  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    zennoposter
  • ptr22ptr22
    @andrzejek, on how many 2.0 webs can it create pages on?
  • donchinodonchino https://pbn.solutions
    SEREngines performance has decreased for me, it used to be better. Lots of ppl are using Rankwyz, I tried it but had some bugs and support is bad. FCS seems the best way to go right now.
  • bnaimybnaimy

    I am using SerEngines, and got a tottal of 11000 web2.0 combined from 3 Projects.

    Not bad i if i have to say myself :)


    What does FCS stand for @donchino ??

  • donchinodonchino https://pbn.solutions
    @bnaimy How many different engines do you get with SerEngines? Last time i tried, i got 4. Of course if i ran the 4 engines i would get infinite amount of web 2.0-s. But how many unique - this is important for me.

    FCS is FCS Networker, you can google it.
  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    @ptr22 on everything u code it to do
  • bnaimybnaimy

    @donchino


    Just counted them, and its 20 different uniques, if you are only getting 4 then something is def not normal.

    20 different platforms is more then fine for me, and i am seeing some massive increase in ranking...currently in timeout (sandbox) before i head over to first page for many keywords. Allready nr1 for 7-8 dfifferent keywords.

    SerEngines was the best Investment i made, why pay services many for web2.0 when i can create a kazzillion of them myself hehe

  • donchinodonchino https://pbn.solutions
    @bnaimy what proxies, emails and captcha you use? would be great to know. it's very hard to believe 20 unique, even JAMESE (the author) himself didn't get that much
  • bnaimybnaimy
    edited May 2015

    @donchino

    Proxy: I use "Proxy bandit" i also tried With Solidproxies and both worked great. But stayed With proxybandit because its alot cheaper. 25 proxies, and running at 240 threads.


    Emails: Just bought 200 emails from fiverr.com for 10 bucks.

    Captcha: I used deathbycaptcha, but got to expensive....now i just use GSA Captchabreaker, still getting hundreds pr day.  Right now its getting 46% successrate With GSA captcha breaker


    I honestly just followed the PDF tutorial, and rest is history really

    In the Schedule options, i use these options:

    1: Time before registering New account : 1440minutts

    2: Time before first post 30min

    3: Time before two post: 1440 minuttes

    4:Maximum post pr account : 100

    5: Amount of accounts pr site: 195


    These settings at the beginning was much lower, but increase it to

    stay under the radar and not get caught.


    Thats all readlly  

  • bnaimybnaimy

    Here is a link of my results :


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/5l22wppszinkzzi/web2.0.png?dl=0


    The ones With the red check, these are SerEngines only, if you add all those together the results is pretty Amazon. That is a boatload of web2.0 :D

    Not doing anything spesial, just followed his guide, but amped up the account and post pr account.

    Forgot to mention one thing, i have said to have GSA SER try over and over again on sites that it previously failed one. So it never gives up lol Not sure if this is helping but that is what i am using .

  • donchinodonchino https://pbn.solutions
    @bnaimy Ok, thank you for the input.

    btw, what emails did you buy.. yahoo? hotmail? something else?
  • ronitronit
    I am a user of fcs networker and I don't suggest you to use it . It's links doesn't get indexed on Google / ahrefs . It has overpriced packages where you have limited submissions . Even if you buy 10K submission package suppose then you will get only 6-8K links as many of the posts get deleted / fails which count on your submission package .

    Stay away from them !!!
  • bnaimybnaimy

    @donchino


    Hey m8, sry tottaly forgot to tell you about that

    I bought 200 Yahoo accounts, these Works quite well for me.


    @ronit

    Thanks for the headsup, ill do some more Research about them first before making any decision.

    I have burned myself alot of times on Products that dont deliver, and i am left holding my Dick in my hand lol heehhe

  • steelbonesteelbone Outside of Boston
    How many emails do you add for each new project?
  • leafcrazyleafcrazy
    lol It appears everyone has complaints about the service they use for web 2.0s
  • rgesmrgesm
    here are my findings for both FCS and SEREngines.

    I've been running a project for 7 days straight...results below

    SERengines web 2.0's created = 3 WEB 2.0's created out of 13,000 submitted and about 15% verified.

    am i doing something wrong for it to only create 3 web 2.0's?

    i also have FCS network and whenever i start a projecct to create WEB 2.0's its pretty simple and it just creates them. I don't have to worry about letting it run for days i just create an account on the first UI and then run my project> after the WEB 2.0's are created import them into GSA SER and build tier to this.

    I'm not an expert but i've learned a lot over the last month and just seeing that I bought so many programs and subscriptions I just see SERengines not really worth the $ or $14./month for the amount of WEB2.0's.

    I'm not sure how well FCS web 2.0's get indexed but some of the campaigns i'm running are doing pretty well. I also use unique article wizard to build a lot of great links with articles. so I'm not sure which ones are performing well.
  • shadir41shadir41
    @rgesm is FCS really worth it? Each article you submit has link to your money site?
  • bnaimybnaimy

    @steelbone


    I am using 200 emails pr project, i changed my settings to alittle higher now in the Schedule options.

    Will still create 195 accounts pr site

    Will post 500 articles from each account, but will wait 24 betwen two post


    Should keep me going all the way up to 1 million web2.0 in the long term

    Currently only at 22k web2.0 so got a long way Ahead


    Here is a small snippet of my list , this is just a tiny list..the list is stupid long:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/gtx3mxh69zcag94/L1.png?dl=0

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/gh7fjc5qt8r5mmn/L2.png?dl=0

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/0rdroq99ud2ve6u/L3.png?dl=0

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/joxo21mkm6f2sdj/L4.png?dl=0

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/njs3o0a6hkvz8pj/L5.png?dl=0

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/c1qw52yuu581jiz/L6.png?dl=0


    Those of you getting only 2-3 web2.0, there is something seriously wrong With Your settings somewere.


  • donchinodonchino https://pbn.solutions
    @ronit , indexing rate does not depend on the tool you create web 2.0, it depends on the content you provide and quality of it, so this fact is not quite accurate. Also, it doesn't matter what tool you use, web 2.0-s do get deleted in either way, this is also often because of spammy content, so i don't really see these two things being FCS's fault - it can happen with any other web 2.0 tool just as well.
  • vikingviking
    In the past I tried Rankwyz and FCS. For the last 6 months I have been using only FCS. I have been asking Dan for a better solution to identify and remove dead accounts, but nothing is in the queue yet. Right now it is a bit frustrating because the dead accounts have to be manually  removed. With a database of 20k 2.0's it becomes a hassle pretty quickly. There aren't many other options that can create 2.0's as easily as FCS, so the hassle may be worth it in the long run.
  • gsa8mycowsgsa8mycows forum.gsa-online.de/profile/11343/gsa8mycows
    I think it's best to come up with self written scripts as that way you don't risk third party's software lack of updates, disappearance or fraud.
  • magicallymagically http://i.imgur.com/Ban0Uo4.png
    @gsa8mycows
    Spot on! I think you are absolutely right here in your observations.
  • peterperseopeterperseo
    That's pretty obvious, it's like to "reinvent the wheel".
    Of course if everybody here were good at writing their own software, they wont' be here buying Gsa software
    :D  ;)
  • TheHairyNinjaTheHairyNinja UK
    Shame you like to use public proxies.
  • perfecterperfecter
    Manual all the way if one's looking for higher quality. On the other hand, FCSNetworker is the current best for web 2.0 automation.
  • 7ThDanWebNinja7ThDanWebNinja
    FCS Networker + article builder.
  • baxelubaxelu
    @bnaimy could You pm images of your Settings ?
  • baxelubaxelu
    @bnaimy no disrespect but if you post 500 articles per account then obviously you will get a Google slap. I don't think anyone here is doing that.
  • adventurousloveradventurouslover
    I use Rankwyz

    Not the best honestly but it works for the price
  • serpsserps Up
    edited June 2015
    @viking have you seen this re: dead account removal >> http://prntscr.com/7cw7id

    @donchino is 100% right re: indexing rate.

    IMO, FCS is very good @ automating 2.0's. It's not perfect, but the best on the market at the moment and does what it needs to do.

    Remember, the best tool/software/system can suck if you don't know how to properly use it....GSA's a prime example.
Sign In or Register to comment.